<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Semantici.st</title>
	<atom:link href="http://semantici.st/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://semantici.st</link>
	<description>Adventures in technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:15:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Why the iPad makes me sad. by Ricky Buchanan</title>
		<link>http://semantici.st/archives/160:why-the-ipad-makes-me-sad/comment-page-1#comment-5123</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky Buchanan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semantici.st/?p=160#comment-5123</guid>
		<description>It makes me sad too, but I know that it&#039;s inevitable. My dad knows how to do heaps of stuff with his car and so do pretty much all the men in his generation because you had to tinker frequently to make them keep running - I don&#039;t know how to do anything but top up the wiper fluid and petrol in a car, and (awkwardly and nervously) change a tyre at a pinch and it&#039;s sad in a way but if I&#039;d used my energy to learn all about cars I couldn&#039;t have used that same energy to learn all about computers.

A good percentage of my friends, given flour, eggs, and other appropriate ingredients, could not bake an edible cake or make pancakes with these things. Almost none of them could do it without a recipe they follow in a &quot;cargo cult&quot; fashion. And they don&#039;t think this is a problem - after all, we live in a world where if you want a cake there&#039;s a bakery down the corner shops and a packet of cake mix at the supermarket.

Do you know how to build a house? Could you turn a pile of cement, bricks, lumber, etc. into a usable dwelling or would you call in a builder? Do you know how to shear a sheep and process the fleece into usable wool which you can then knit into a jumper? Do you know how to turn apple seeds into a healthy orchard, given time and water? Do you think that not knowing all of these things makes a person&#039;s life sadder ... I do and I don&#039;t, in different measures at different times.

NONE of us can know a lot about everything, the sum of human knowledge is too large. I don&#039;t think that it&#039;s bad that many people don&#039;t want to know about the building of software, any more than it&#039;s bad they don&#039;t want to know about the building of their houses, cars, food, etc.

So if the geeks of the next generation don&#039;t need to know about Deep Computer Wisdom(TM) to keep their machines going, what will they put their energy into? When Dad was learning about cars, computers were at the level of punched cards and FORTRAN - there&#039;s no way to forsee what the geek energy of future generations will be focussed towards, but I have to believe it&#039;ll be as fantastic (in all senses of the word) as today&#039;s PCs are to a guy who remembers punched cards and FORTRAN...

Ricky
(Who, incidentally, knows how to bake pancakes and cake from scratch without a recipe, grow trees and vegetables, milk cows (haven&#039;t done it for years though - I&#039;d need practice), spin a little (ditto), knit, crochet, make patterns for clothes and then sew them, weave, do a fair bit of the stuff involved in house building, and program computers too. I&#039;m the woman you want to have around after the apocalypse happens!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes me sad too, but I know that it&#8217;s inevitable. My dad knows how to do heaps of stuff with his car and so do pretty much all the men in his generation because you had to tinker frequently to make them keep running &#8211; I don&#8217;t know how to do anything but top up the wiper fluid and petrol in a car, and (awkwardly and nervously) change a tyre at a pinch and it&#8217;s sad in a way but if I&#8217;d used my energy to learn all about cars I couldn&#8217;t have used that same energy to learn all about computers.</p>
<p>A good percentage of my friends, given flour, eggs, and other appropriate ingredients, could not bake an edible cake or make pancakes with these things. Almost none of them could do it without a recipe they follow in a &#8220;cargo cult&#8221; fashion. And they don&#8217;t think this is a problem &#8211; after all, we live in a world where if you want a cake there&#8217;s a bakery down the corner shops and a packet of cake mix at the supermarket.</p>
<p>Do you know how to build a house? Could you turn a pile of cement, bricks, lumber, etc. into a usable dwelling or would you call in a builder? Do you know how to shear a sheep and process the fleece into usable wool which you can then knit into a jumper? Do you know how to turn apple seeds into a healthy orchard, given time and water? Do you think that not knowing all of these things makes a person&#8217;s life sadder &#8230; I do and I don&#8217;t, in different measures at different times.</p>
<p>NONE of us can know a lot about everything, the sum of human knowledge is too large. I don&#8217;t think that it&#8217;s bad that many people don&#8217;t want to know about the building of software, any more than it&#8217;s bad they don&#8217;t want to know about the building of their houses, cars, food, etc.</p>
<p>So if the geeks of the next generation don&#8217;t need to know about Deep Computer Wisdom(TM) to keep their machines going, what will they put their energy into? When Dad was learning about cars, computers were at the level of punched cards and FORTRAN &#8211; there&#8217;s no way to forsee what the geek energy of future generations will be focussed towards, but I have to believe it&#8217;ll be as fantastic (in all senses of the word) as today&#8217;s PCs are to a guy who remembers punched cards and FORTRAN&#8230;</p>
<p>Ricky<br />
(Who, incidentally, knows how to bake pancakes and cake from scratch without a recipe, grow trees and vegetables, milk cows (haven&#8217;t done it for years though &#8211; I&#8217;d need practice), spin a little (ditto), knit, crochet, make patterns for clothes and then sew them, weave, do a fair bit of the stuff involved in house building, and program computers too. I&#8217;m the woman you want to have around after the apocalypse happens!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scotfail. by John Gallagher</title>
		<link>http://semantici.st/archives/144:scotfail/comment-page-1#comment-4374</link>
		<dc:creator>John Gallagher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semantici.st/?p=144#comment-4374</guid>
		<description>John

Fucking, cunting, twatting brilliant. Sweary, ranty letters are always good and this is the best I&#039;ve seen in a while. I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll get a pathetically politically correct reply from them if you get one at all, but at least your excellent letter will have given some poor sod at ScotRail whose job it is to read customer complaints some amusement.

Well done.

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John</p>
<p>Fucking, cunting, twatting brilliant. Sweary, ranty letters are always good and this is the best I&#8217;ve seen in a while. I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll get a pathetically politically correct reply from them if you get one at all, but at least your excellent letter will have given some poor sod at ScotRail whose job it is to read customer complaints some amusement.</p>
<p>Well done.</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scotfail. by Amy</title>
		<link>http://semantici.st/archives/144:scotfail/comment-page-1#comment-4337</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semantici.st/?p=144#comment-4337</guid>
		<description>And here I thought OCTranspo was made of fail. 
Kudos on the great write up that says everything you want it to and more. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here I thought OCTranspo was made of fail.<br />
Kudos on the great write up that says everything you want it to and more. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scotfail. by uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://semantici.st/archives/144:scotfail/comment-page-1#comment-4319</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semantici.st/?p=144#comment-4319</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by semanticist: New blog post: Scotfail. http://semantici.st/archives/144:scotfail...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by semanticist: New blog post: Scotfail. <a href="http://semantici.st/archives/144:scotfail.." rel="nofollow">http://semantici.st/archives/144:scotfail..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scotfail. by Aleriel</title>
		<link>http://semantici.st/archives/144:scotfail/comment-page-1#comment-4318</link>
		<dc:creator>Aleriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semantici.st/?p=144#comment-4318</guid>
		<description>Ouch. And I thought Toronto transit was bad. But I must admit your commuting misfortunes are fun to read about. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch. And I thought Toronto transit was bad. But I must admit your commuting misfortunes are fun to read about. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scotfail. by Cesy</title>
		<link>http://semantici.st/archives/144:scotfail/comment-page-1#comment-4312</link>
		<dc:creator>Cesy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semantici.st/?p=144#comment-4312</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s amazing. Nice write-up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s amazing. Nice write-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scotfail. by Tweets that mention Semantici.st - Scotfail. -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://semantici.st/archives/144:scotfail/comment-page-1#comment-4308</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Semantici.st - Scotfail. -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semantici.st/?p=144#comment-4308</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by azurelunatic, John. John said: New blog post: Scotfail. http://semantici.st/archives/144:scotfail [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by azurelunatic, John. John said: New blog post: Scotfail. <a href="http://semantici.st/archives/144:scotfail" rel="nofollow">http://semantici.st/archives/144:scotfail</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twittermancy and Open Sourcery by HB</title>
		<link>http://semantici.st/archives/135:twittermancy-and-open-sourcery/comment-page-1#comment-4025</link>
		<dc:creator>HB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semantici.st/?p=135#comment-4025</guid>
		<description>Hey, a technopagan!  Neato.  I agree, free licences are very pagan in outlook.  And &quot;open sourcery&quot; is a damn cool term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, a technopagan!  Neato.  I agree, free licences are very pagan in outlook.  And &#8220;open sourcery&#8221; is a damn cool term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Doing it wrong. by Glenn Halstead</title>
		<link>http://semantici.st/archives/123:doing-it-wrong/comment-page-1#comment-3369</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Halstead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 23:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semantici.st/?p=123#comment-3369</guid>
		<description>Could I help with the automated testing?  That&#039;s where my interests lie although probably not with the technologies your using...e.g Ruby.  I am a test automation guy as a day job.  I&#039;m not sure I can help but maybe I could bring my testing abilities to the code domain / technologies you&#039;re using and we could both gain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could I help with the automated testing?  That&#8217;s where my interests lie although probably not with the technologies your using&#8230;e.g Ruby.  I am a test automation guy as a day job.  I&#8217;m not sure I can help but maybe I could bring my testing abilities to the code domain / technologies you&#8217;re using and we could both gain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Approach by Semantici.st - A quick technopagan tool</title>
		<link>http://semantici.st/archives/107:new-approach/comment-page-1#comment-1920</link>
		<dc:creator>Semantici.st - A quick technopagan tool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 22:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semantici.st/?p=107#comment-1920</guid>
		<description>[...] kind of goes against my earlier post about not keeping learning projects around for too long, since a play-around with RMagick turned into something that&#8217;s living on my deployment VM, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] kind of goes against my earlier post about not keeping learning projects around for too long, since a play-around with RMagick turned into something that&#8217;s living on my deployment VM, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
